5-((1R)-2,5-Diazabicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl)-1,2,4-thiadiazole CAS 174953-95-8

Purity 97%+In StockPharmaceutical Standards
CAS No.174953-95-8
Molecular FormulaC7H10N4S
Molecular Weight182.25 g/mol
CategoryPharmaceutical Standards / API Standards
AvailabilityIn Stock

Chemical Structure

5-((1R)-2,5-Diazabicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl)-1,2,4-thiadiazole CAS 174953-95-8 chemical structure

Description

5-((1R)-2,5-Diazabicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl)-1,2,4-thiadiazole (CAS 174953-95-8) is a high-purity analytical reference standard with the molecular formula C7H10N4S and a molecular weight of 182.25 g/mol.

The molecular framework of 5-((1R)-2,5-Diazabicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl)-1,2,4-thiadiazole (C7H10N4S) is characterized by a nitrile group, sulfur-containing functionality, an aromatic ring system. In reversed-phase chromatography, its retention is governed primarily by the protonation state of its nitrogen-containing groups, which provides a practical basis for HPLC-UV/DAD or LC-MS method development. Nitrogen-containing functional groups confer excellent ionization efficiency in positive-ion electrospray (ESI) mode, making the compound well suited to LC-MS/MS analysis.

This reference standard is suitable for quantitative analysis on major chromatographic platforms including HPLC, GC, LC-MS/MS, and GC-MS, serving as an external calibration standard or a system suitability test reference material.

The assigned purity is verified by mass-balance and quantitative NMR (qNMR) approaches, with the expanded uncertainty reported at a 95% confidence level (k=2). Batch homogeneity and stability are independently assessed for every lot.

Physical & Chemical Properties

Molecular FormulaC7H10N4S
Molecular Weight182.25 g/mol
Purity97%+
StorageStore at 2-8°C, protect from light
Solubility (reference)Soluble in DMSO, DMF, methanol
StabilityLight-sensitive; avoid direct strong light
Degree of Unsaturation (DBE)5.0
UV AbsorptionUV-absorbing
Structural FeaturesAromatic ring present
CAS Registry Year (est.)2006
Nitrogen Atoms4
Sulfur Atoms1

Related R Standards

Recommended Standards

Why CATO?