1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10-Henicosafluorodecane CAS 375-97-3

Purity 97%+In StockPharmaceutical Standards
CAS No.375-97-3
Molecular FormulaC10HF21
Molecular Weight520.08 g/mol
CategoryPharmaceutical Standards / API Standards
AvailabilityIn Stock

Chemical Structure

1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10-Henicosafluorodecane CAS 375-97-3 chemical structure

Description

The occurrence of 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10-Henicosafluorodecane is closely related to fluorine substitution in its molecular formula, which determines its behaviour during synthesis, purification, or degradation.

1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10-Henicosafluorodecane (CAS 375-97-3) is a high-purity analytical reference standard with the molecular formula C10HF21 and a molecular weight of 520.08 g/mol.

Owing to fluorine substitution, 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10-Henicosafluorodecane is typically white to off-white crystalline powder. Its solid-state physicochemical attributes — including a molecular weight of 520.08 g/mol — guide the selection of appropriate sample preparation and analytical techniques. Halogen substitution (F/Cl/Br/I) produces a distinctive isotope pattern in mass spectrometry, a valuable aid for qualitative confirmation.

Recommended for analytical method development and validation; each product is supplied with a full Certificate of Analysis (COA) ensuring ISO 17034 metrological traceability.

The assigned purity is verified by mass-balance and quantitative NMR (qNMR) approaches, with the expanded uncertainty reported at a 95% confidence level (k=2). Batch homogeneity and stability are independently assessed for every lot.

Physical & Chemical Properties

Molecular FormulaC10HF21
Molecular Weight520.08 g/mol
Purity97%+
StorageStore at room temperature
Solubility (reference)Soluble in chloroform, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate
StabilityStable under recommended storage conditions
Degree of Unsaturation (DBE)0.0
CAS Registry Year (est.)1957
Halogen ContentF-containing

Recommended Standards

Why CATO?