(1R,4R)-2,5-Diphenylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene CAS 796966-15-9

Purity 97%+In StockPharmaceutical Standards
CAS No.796966-15-9
Molecular FormulaC20H18
Molecular Weight258.36 g/mol
CategoryPharmaceutical Standards / API Standards
AvailabilityIn Stock

Chemical Structure

(1R,4R)-2,5-Diphenylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene CAS 796966-15-9 chemical structure

Description

Compared with other compounds in its class, the molecular weight of 258.36 g/mol gives (1R,4R)-2,5-Diphenylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene distinctive chromatographic separation conditions and mass-spectrometry parameter settings.

(1R,4R)-2,5-Diphenylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene (CAS 796966-15-9) is a high-purity analytical reference standard with the molecular formula C20H18 and a molecular weight of 258.36 g/mol.

Owing to a polycyclic aromatic system, (1R,4R)-2,5-Diphenylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene is typically pale yellow to yellow low-melting solid. Its solid-state physicochemical attributes — including a molecular weight of 258.36 g/mol — guide the selection of appropriate sample preparation and analytical techniques. The aromatic system may exhibit native fluorescence, enabling detection with a fluorescence detector (FLD).

Recommended for analytical method development and validation; each product is supplied with a full Certificate of Analysis (COA) ensuring ISO 17034 metrological traceability.

As a certified reference material (CRM), (1R,4R)-2,5-Diphenylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene meets the metrological traceability requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 laboratories. Batch-to-batch consistency is monitored via control charts to guarantee comparable assigned values across lots.

Physical & Chemical Properties

Molecular FormulaC20H18
Molecular Weight258.36 g/mol
Purity97%+
StorageStore at 2-8°C, protect from light
Solubility (reference)Soluble in chloroform, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate
StabilityLight-sensitive; avoid direct strong light
Degree of Unsaturation (DBE)12.0
UV AbsorptionUV-absorbing
Structural FeaturesAromatic ring present
CAS Registry Year (est.)1986

Recommended Standards

Why CATO?