6-(4-Ethylpiperazin-1-yl)pyrimidin-4-amine CAS 959696-43-6

Purity 97%+In StockPharmaceutical Standards
CAS No.959696-43-6
Molecular FormulaC10H17N5
Molecular Weight207.28 g/mol
CategoryPharmaceutical Standards / API Standards
AvailabilityIn Stock

Chemical Structure

6-(4-Ethylpiperazin-1-yl)pyrimidin-4-amine CAS 959696-43-6 chemical structure

Description

CATO manufactures 6-(4-Ethylpiperazin-1-yl)pyrimidin-4-amine under ISO 17034:2016 accreditation with dual CNAS and ANAB accreditation. Each batch is characterized by orthogonal methods and supplied with a full Certificate of Analysis (COA), ensuring metrological traceability.

6-(4-Ethylpiperazin-1-yl)pyrimidin-4-amine (CAS 959696-43-6) is a high-purity analytical reference standard with the molecular formula C10H17N5 and a molecular weight of 207.28 g/mol.

The molecular framework of 6-(4-Ethylpiperazin-1-yl)pyrimidin-4-amine (C10H17N5) is characterized by a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic scaffold, a nitrile group. In reversed-phase chromatography, its retention is governed primarily by the protonation state of its nitrogen-containing groups, which provides a practical basis for HPLC-UV/DAD or LC-MS method development. The presence of an aromatic ring or conjugated system gives the compound characteristic absorption bands in the UV-Vis region, making it well suited to UV or diode-array detection (DAD).

Recommended for analytical method development and validation; each product is supplied with a full Certificate of Analysis (COA) ensuring ISO 17034 metrological traceability.

Physical & Chemical Properties

Molecular FormulaC10H17N5
Molecular Weight207.28 g/mol
AppearanceOff-white to pale yellow crystalline powder. (faint amine-like odor)
Purity97%+
StorageStore at 2-8°C, protect from light
Solubility (reference)Soluble in DMSO, DMF, methanol
StabilityLight-sensitive; avoid direct strong light
Degree of Unsaturation (DBE)5.0
UV AbsorptionUV-absorbing
Structural FeaturesAromatic ring present
CAS Registry Year (est.)1987
Nitrogen Atoms5

Related Ethylpiperazin Standards

Recommended Standards

Why CATO?